Niahak's Place

It’s not often I come across a PS2 game I haven’t heard anything about.  I’m still not certain I hadn’t heard of Ring of Red before, but having played it some I’m that much more surprised.

It’s not that it’s an amazingly good game – far from it, it’s somewhat clunky and has an odd dichotomy of style (showing WWII-style videos alongside anime-drawn characters).

AFW firing is inaccurate at best, making the game feel more realistic (if more boring)

And yet, it’s this bizarre combination of WW2-esque aesthetic as well as anime style that makes this game feel right.  Unlike more standard games and anime, the “mechs” (here called AFWs) are portrayed as surprisingly realistic – they have a crew to load and maintain them, are somewhat slow and clunky, and are supported on the ground by infantry.

It’s not like Ring of Red is particularly realistic – I haven’t ever thought of realism a great metric for a game’s quality, in any case – but its alternate history setting, in which Japan refused to surrender at the end of WW2 and became a territory divided between Stalin’s Russia and the United States, is surprisingly well-crafted (even if the excuse for walking tanks is a little bit far-fetched).

Infantry support uses skills to affect the course of battle

Gameplay is a little bit strange.  Like Battle Stations or The Unholy War (if I’m remembering right), it is a standard tactical RPG until two units clash.  At this point you go into a semi-action-mode wherein you have 90 seconds to fight the enemy.  You can determine which of your three infantry units pilots the mech, and the other two act as ground support with various capabilities.

If well done, it would’ve been really great.  The battle chatter amongst your units enhances the feeling of a WW2-esque conflict, and although the graphics are a bit dated the animations are decent.  Unfortunately, as an early PS2 game, Ring of Red is far too obsessed with spectacle and does not allow you to skip animations or automate battles.  This would be okay if the animations weren’t shown 3-4 times a battle, or if they were particularly impressive (they are nice the first few times, I suppose).  When each engagement takes 90 seconds, you’re looking at taking up to 7 or 8 minutes to move each of your units.  Although this isn’t horrible, and thus far missions have taken only slightly longer than a standard SRPG, I can imagine it will bog down as the game progresses.

Is it a great game?  I highly doubt it.  But it’s original, and that makes it worth trying in my book.

I have been playing Tales of Symphonia: Dawn of the New World for about 15 hours total over the course of around two weeks.  I’m sorry to say it really doesn’t live up to its predecessor.

There are several reasons for this; first is that what Tales of Symphonia did best was broken.  Load times, for example, are fine, but combat feels very… uncomfortable.  Enemies will slip out of your range for no apparent reason; your special moves might miss an enemy because said enemy is too short, or you happened to hit them with a regular attack that knocked them just far enough away.  That’s when the special moves are worth using; many of them actually do less damage than your normal attacks.

Enemies are more aggressive, too, and can attack under unreasonable circumstances.  If you’re hit once, you’re “interrupted” and can’t immediately counter; meanwhile, if you interrupt an enemy they will often just keep on hitting you (thus interrupting you, etc).  In the all-too-common occurrance of being double-teamed, you may not be able to do anything at all – except perhaps block, if you’re lucky – until you just die.

Many will likely complain about the protagonist, Emil.  Half of his lines in the first hour involve apologizing, sometimes for over-apologizing.   Some have said that he is worse than FFX’s Tidus; I disagree, because Emil not only has a half-decent voice actor, he has actually shown the capacity to grow and become a moderately interesting character.

While the combat system is the main disappointment, other aspects of the game have been simplified to nothing.  EX skills, which had all kinds of useful combos and strategy, were removed in favor of (just) skills, gained on level up, which use a point-based system to equip.

Overall, it’s not terrible or anything – just not as good as its more worthy predecessor.  It reminds me of Suikoden IV in a lot of ways – the previous game was somewhat clunky and maybe a bit too exaggerated, so what came out of it was a sequel which looks bland and plays worse.

It does, naturally, have its upshot – the “Skits”, little character-interaction segments in the game, are really well-voiced (much better than the in-game work) and really bring out the personalities of the characters.  I’m going to keep playing to see what happens in the plot, but not with the excitement with which I finished the first Tales of Symphonia.